The REAL Question that Obama Needs To Answer

This should be a must read before anyone in this country votes in this election.

From Matt Bracken:

Did Obama Withhold Cross-Border Authority?
Please help me.
I am trying as hard as I can to get out the word about cross-border authority (CBA).
I just can’t believe reporters don’t know enough to ask the right questions! It’s infuriating.

Libya, as far as standing down the rescue, is 100% Obama’s show, and nobody else’s. Only he can grant CBA, not Biden, not Panetta, not Dempsey, not Hillary, and certainly not Ham in Germany.

The entire episode is explained perfectly inside the context of not granting CBA. The CIA QRF in Tripoli? No problem, send them on the local Tripoli station chief’s say-so. He merely informs up COC that he has done so. CCs them so to speak. “This is what I am doing.” Ditto if Predators were in country, no problem using them.

But the big rescue air armada streaming toward Libya right away after the alarm got to Stuttgart and Africom? That has to stop. I believe at the 5pm meeting with Panetta and Biden in the Oval Office, he said, “No outside military intervention,” on the basis that the last report was the “lull” from the consulate, at about 1030 p.m. in Benghazi, when the attack appeared to be over and the situation stabilizing.
(As a soft exception, Obama may have authorized sending an unarmed Predator from outside of Libya, but I am thinking the two Predators were already in-country, and hence available to use within “no CBA granted” rules.)

“No outside military intervention” equals “no cross-border authority” and that constitutes “standing orders” until POTUS changes them. Nobody else can “un-decide” the POTUS decree. The rescue air-armada of C-17s, C-130s and SOF helos like MH-47 Chinooks and Pavehawks cannot proceed directly to Libya without CBA being granted, so instead they are all staged at Sigonella, Sicily.

USN ships are in position to “lilypad” helos for long over-water flights. Airborne tankers are coming into position. SOF forces in Sigonella are going over their gear for different contingencies. Fuming all night as officers keep checking in with operational commanders. “Hold in place, no rescue yet. We can’t find the President, it sounds like,” say the colonels to the majors and captains. 100s of military must know about this. I keep waiting for the conclusive whistle-blowers to come forward BEFORE the election. After won’t matter, it will be for the historians.

Panetta is falling on his sword for Obama with his absurd-on-its-face, “The military doesn’t do risky things” defense of no rescue. Panetta is destroying his future reputation entirely, to save Obama. The question is why? Loyalty?

Petreaus was probably “used” in some way early, about the supposed CIA intel link to the Mohammed video, and now he feels burned. So he conclusively said via his PAO, “The stand-down order did not come from CIA.”

Well, what is higher than CIA? Only White House. Obama, nobody else. Petreaus is naming Obama without naming him.

Now, as far as Obama / Huma Abedin / Valerie Jarrett etc actually wanting Ambassador Stevens dead, to terminate the end of the very dirty Libyan arms to Syrian AQ programs, I can’t speculate. Obama is not competent enough, I’m thinking.
But for sure, the ambassador going to unsecure Benghazi on 9-11 of all days stinks to me of a setup. You can bet Stevens would have told the Turks, “No, 9-11 is not a good day for us,” and stayed in Tripoli behind many high and thick walls. For him to go to dangerous Benghazi on 9-11 means the Turks totally insisted, but why would they care about the meeting date, unless they were in on a “hit” as the Judas goat?

Alternatively, ordering Stevens to meet the Turks in Benghazi on 9-11 may have come from down OUR chain of command. Stevens seems to have been wearing two hats as ambassador and CIA arms shipper. Moving between more-secure Tripoli, the Benghazi “consulate,” and the CIA “annex.” So orders to him might come down the State or the CIA commo channels, or both. I am unclear on his job title and true position, but either the CIA or State sends him final instructions. How this works with “dual-hatted” ambassadors, I haven’t a clue.

But Stevens meeting the Turks at the unsecure Benghazi “consulate” on 9-11 stinks to me of a deliberate setup. The Turks left the meeting and probably flashed their headlights to the attack team commanders lurking in shadows. A coded text, a word on a phone, meaning, “The ambassador is there, with minimal security: proceed with the attack plan.”

That is all pure speculation. What I know FOR SURE is that the big “stand down order” issue revolves around granting or withholding cross-border authority.

Every SOF officer and ops officer all the way up has this drummed into his head. We can make Obama respond to this question, even if reporters must shout it at him while he’s doing storm cleanup photo ops. If the reporters KNOW enough to ask the quesion.

That’s why I am shouting all over the internet about CBA.
I can’t believe cross-border authority permission is not one of the top discussion points about Benghazi.
That, and who “set him up” by sending him to Beghazi to meet the Turks on 9-11, with them leaving after dark.

And of course, down the road, was the military rescue-in-progress turned back because Obama actually wanted to make sure the consulate was wiped out? Is that why the spooks at the annex were refused permission to travel the under one mile to intervene? That would connect it all together, but for now, the best focus is on Obama either granting or withholding cross-border authority for the rescue.
 
Feel free to repost these musings of a long-ago SOF officer anywhere you please.


I posted this, so are YOU going to spread this to your friends?
PSD

Which One Are You?

http://youtu.be/el15bdzKBlQ

True That

Enough said

Who Says Crime Doen't Pay

Forgotten Man

OBAMANATION

1% or 99%, this tells the truth

It doesn't matter if you are a 1%er or a 99%er, these statistics from the IRS tells it all. Watch it yourself and see. I'm not a 1%er by their standards, but I don't consider myself a 99%er either. I am an American that wants our government to get back on track. Everyone needs to pay taxes, or like Bill says, "everyone needs to have skin in the game." You decide.

God and Jerusalem

They pushed this through....

Why do so many not want God or Jerusalem mentioned in their platform?

Insanity Gone Wild

You have heard of Girls gone wild, but the next story should be labeled Insanity gone wild. What does that mean, you say? Well after you read this article you will say "that's insane". Who was the PhD that thought of this deal? And better yet, is he still employed? Let me break down a few points of the article for you.

The government agreed to keep Fannie and Freddie afloat four years ago through a complex arrangement where the Treasury injects capital into the firms as needed every quarter to keep them afloat, and it receives preferred shares in exchange. Those shares pay a 10% dividend.

Well there you have it. It starts out pretty good, except for the 10% dividend. Why 10% when the common folk only gets maybe 2% interest. Okay, I know, because it was a risky loan. I mean, it is a government agency, US Treasury Department, bailing out Freddie and Fannie who are other government directed agencies. 

But the arrangement wasn’t expected to last this long. Congress and the Obama administration have taken few steps towards advancing any overhaul. That has led to perverse outcomes like the one currently facing the companies: Even if they’re profitable, there’s no mechanism for them to pay off the government–and they may continue to borrow money simply to pay those dividends.

Look at that section highlighted in red. Read it again and let it sink in until the light bulb comes on over your head. Yep, I see the lights on...you have figured it out. They may have to continue to borrow money just to pay the dividends. Now you might have thought, "well the economy has tanked further than anyone expected, so they may have to wait for the housing industry rebounds before profits return enough to pay those dividends". That is until you read this:

Fannie currently has to pay $12 billion in dividends every year. That’s more than the company has ever earned in one year.

Wow, more than they have ever earned in one year! Again, where were the PhD's and Accountants that are paid to figure these things out BEFORE they sign the contract. Anyone involved with approving this contract  should be fired.

In 2009, the Treasury Department said it would provide unlimited help for three years. But beginning in January, the companies once again will have a fixed amount of money available from the Treasury: $125 billion for Fannie and $150 billion for Freddie. 

Really, did they not learn the first time? Insanity Gone Wild I tell you. We peasants should be outraged as this is our money they play with. These actions cannot be sustained. The house of cards will collapse. 

Well 

Teenagers Speaking The Truth...

Now if we could only get the politicians to speak the truth as well. If someone would not be afraid of getting up in front of the cameras in America and speak these truths, maybe...just maybe they would get the majority of votes.