Wednesday, July 28, 2010

What Big Ben Did NOT Tell CONgress

In his testimony before Congress last week, there wer some things that Ben Bernanke did not say.

There were things he did not discuss and some things he did not truely explain. Why? Why is the economy still in a decline? There are four BOMBSHELLS that need to be discussed and Martin Weiss did so in the above article. Here are some excerpts.

FIRST and foremost, what's CAUSING the economy to sink? The stock market has not yet crashed. Interest rates have not yet surged. Gasoline prices have not skyrocketed. There has been no recent debt collapse, market shock, or terrorist attack.

So what is the invisible force that's suddenly gutting the housing market, driving consumer confidence into a sinkhole, and killing the recovery that Washington was so avidly touting just a few months ago?

Bernanke won't say. But the answer is clear: The recovery had very little substance to begin with. Rather, it was, in essence, a mirage — a dead cat bounce bought and paid for by Washington's massive bailouts, stimulus programs, and money printing.

Put another way, the recession never really ended.

SECOND, Bernanke failed to point how that ...

The U.S. Housing Market Is Now LOCKED Into a Chronic, Long-Term Depression
Housing starts — the most important measure of the housing industry — is still a disaster zone.

Beginning in January 2006, they suffered their worst plunge in recorded history — from an annual rate of 2.3 million to a meager 477,000 in April 2009. Thus ...

In just three years, 79 percent of America's largest industry, impacting more Americans than any other, was wiped away.




Then, despite a series of government agency programs to shore up the industry ... plus $1.25 trillion poured in by the Fed to buy up mortgage-backed securities ... plus a big tax credit for new homebuyers, housing starts perked up ever so slightly: They recovered to an annual rate of 612,000 in January of this year.

But this recovery was so small, it retraced just 7.5 percent of the prior fall. In other words, even after massive government efforts, and even at the highest point in their recovery this year, the housing industry recouped less than one-tenth of its historic three-year bust from 2006 to 2009.

Worse, the housing industry has now resumed its decline.

The most alarming factor: Widespread "strategic defaults" on home mortgages. These are defaults by homeowners who can afford to meet their monthly mortgage payments, but have deliberately decided to stop paying.

They realize their home is worth less than they owe on the mortgage — transforming it into a dead asset they're willing to give up. They know their bank, already overwhelmed with foreclosures, won't get around to evicting them for as long as two years, allowing them to live in the house cost-free. They also know this tactic can give them tens of thousands of dollars in extra cash. So they're defaulting en masse and getting away with it.

End result:
New supplies of foreclosed homes hitting the market as far as the eye can see ...

Bankers who would rather cut their wrists than finance new homes, and ...

A new slump in housing that's worse than even some pessimists were expecting.

THIRD, despite his now-famous quote that this is "the worst labor market since the Great Depression," Bernanke failed to reveal that ...

Official Government Data GROSSLY Understates the Magnitude of Unemployment

Bernanke did not mention that the percentage of long-term unemployed in America is the worst it's been since the government began keeping records in 1948. Two facts:




Fact #1: A record 4.39 percent of the work force — or 46.2 percent of the unemployed — have been out of work for 27 weeks or more. That's DOUBLE the worst level ever recorded and TRIPLE the peak level seen in five of the past six recessions.

Fact #2: On average, America's unemployed have been out of work for 35.2 weeks, also the highest on record.

Bernanke did not remind Congress that, based on the government's own broad measure, the true unemployment rate in the U.S. is not 9.5 percent. It's 16.5 percent — or seven full percentage points more than the figure Mr. Bernanke likes to refer to.

This broader measure includes workers seeking full-time employment, but temporarily settling for lower paying part-time jobs. Plus, it's supposed to also include "discouraged workers" — those who have given up looking for work because there are no jobs to be found.

Nor did Bernanke confess that, during the Clinton administration, discouraged workers were "redefined" to EXCLUDE those who had been out of work for more than a year — and that definition continues to be used to this day.

That makes absolutely no sense. If they're out of work for a year, they're discouraged. But as soon as they're out of work for a year and one day, it's suddenly assumed they're happily going about their life?!

Thus, precisely when economists now recognize that one of the biggest challenges of this Great Recession is long-term unemployment ... the Obama administration, both parties in Congress, and all U.S. government agencies continue to exclude the longest term unemployed from every single one of their unemployment statistics.

This could go down in history as one of the greatest deceptions about the true state of U.S. labor markets. And according to John Williams of Shadow Government Statistics, it's big:

When you add these long-term discouraged workers back into the jobless count, you find that the real unemployment rate in the U.S. is actually 21.6 percent!

FOURTH, Bernanke failed to point out that all this is happening despite ...

The Biggest Government Interventions of ALL TIME!

The full scope of the government's interventions is now official:

In its July 21 Quarterly Report to Congress, the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP) tabulates the government's bailouts, stimulus programs, and money printing escapades since the debt crisis struck in 2007, as follows:

According to SIGTARP, at mid-year 2010,

The Fed has pumped in $1.7 trillion through its massive purchases of mortgage bonds, Treasury bonds, and agency bonds.

The FDIC has thrown another $300 billion into the pot, shutting down over 100 banks so far this year.

The Treasury has pumped in a net of $300 billion in TARP money (even after paybacks), plus another $500 billion in money outside of the TARP program.

Plus, several other government agencies have chipped in another $800 billion.

These official numbers are actually LARGER than we were estimating. We had the total pegged at $3.5 trillion (not billion), including the 2009 stimulus package.

SIGTARP has it at $3.7 trillion, excluding the stimulus but including a myriad other rescue programs — by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), and the Veterans Affair (VA).

But no matter how you count it, some outstanding facts are absolutely self-evident:

FACT: The enormous magnitude of the government's intervention FAR surpasses anything ever witnessed in the history of humankind.

FACT: It's not working! Housing is still collapsed. Long-term unemployment is the worst ever recorded. And the recovery, already anemic, is aborting prematurely.

FACT: Most important, it's winding down! Through mid-2009, the government intervention programs tabulated by SIGTARP were being ramped up at a furious pace — a total of $3 trillion overall.

So over the 12-month period from mid-2008 through mid-2009, we estimate they were running at the average monthly pace of about $160 billion. But since mid-2009, they have been far slower, running at an average monthly pace of only $58 billion, or just one-third the prior level. And right now, the pace of new funds injected into the economy through these government rescues are merely a trickle compared to their earlier rate:

**No new stimulus is in the works.
**No new TARP funds are forthcoming.
**The Fed has wrapped up its bond buying splurge.
**And the ONLY significant continuing programs are for housing — the one area where the government has admittedly seen the WORST overall results, according to SIGTARP.

Bottom line:
If you were counting on the government to prevent the second major leg in this great double-dip recession, don't hold your breath. To the contrary, the primary CAUSE of the second dip is the government's conspicuous absence from sectors where it was, until now, the biggest mover, shaker, buyer, and financier.

Keep your eyes open and prepare for the future.

Saturday, July 24, 2010

North Korea Threatens Nuke To War Exercises

North Korea said it would counter U.S. and South Korean joint naval exercises with “nuclear deterrence” after the Obama administration said the government in Pyongyang shouldn’t take any provocative steps.

US aircraft carrier ups pressure on NKorea. The military drills, code-named "Invincible Spirit," are to run Sunday through Wednesday with about 8,000 U.S. and South Korean troops, 20 ships and submarines and 200 aircraft. The Nimitz-class USS George Washington, with several thousand sailors and dozens of fighters aboard, was deployed from Japan.

Well, Kim Jong Ill is a wild card, so this will be interesting. NKorea has also been in contact with Iran and Pres. Imanutinthehead. Don't know what will happen, but keep your eyes open.

Friday, July 23, 2010

Big Ben Supports Keeping The Bush Tax Cuts!

Well, the DOW shot up 200 points yesterday just after Ben Bernake stated he supported keeping the Bush tax cuts. Now, will the White House and CONgress listen? That will be the question.

 Bernanke Urges Congress to Renew Bush Tax Cuts

“In the short term I would believe that we ought to maintain a reasonable degree of fiscal support, stimulus for the economy,” Bernanke told the House Financial Services Committee. “There are many ways to do that. This is one way.”

Bernanke's statement put him directly at odds with White House officials and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who favor raising taxes on wealthy Americans by letting the tax cuts the Bush administration passed in 2001 and 2003 expire.

The Labor Department reported a spike in claims for state unemployment benefits Thursday, to more than 464,000 last week. In what may have been the understatement of the day, Bernanke's colleague, New York Fed President William Dudley, told the panel that the “road to recovery is turning out to be a bit bumpy.”


A bit bumpy is an understatement! New estimates from the White House on Friday predict the budget deficit will reach a record $1.47 trillion this year. The government is borrowing 41 cents of every dollar it spends. 

New Jobless Claims Jump by 37,000 After Hitting 2-Year Low.

Things are getting so bad in Newark that the mayor has ordered the government to stop buying toilet paper. They may need to layoff as many as 350 police and firefighters as well.

Don't let the MSM lull you into believing that the economy is "recovering". If those articles don't show you we are still in a downturn, let me know and I'll show you more truths. I've said it before that we cannot keep up this spending and running deficits like we have so far. A business could never stay in business operating like this. How long can a government...oh, I guess we could ask Greece, Spain, Ireland, and Portugal. I don't think this will end very well for anyone, rich or poor. Taxes ARE going up and probably sooner than later. If queen Pelosi had it her way it will start in January 2011.

All I can say is be prepared.

Monday, July 19, 2010

Let's Watch Where Your Money Is Going

Okay, this goes into the file titled....YOU GOT TO BE KIDDING!
My comments are in red.


LA JOLLA, CA

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Grant: $233,825 - National Science Foundation - Jul. 19, 2009

Award Description: Despite pouring millions of dollars into programs to further the democratization of Africa, donors remain uninformed about one of the most important facets of politics on the continent: Why do Africans vote they way they do? (Why do we care?) Most observers of African elections view the process as a mere ethnic headcount: all citizens vote for their own ethnic group regardless of the performance of the incumbent government and without reference to the issues of the day. Yet there is scant evidence to support this view. In the vast majority of African countries a single ethnic group cannot achieve a majority of the votes. Ethnic coalitions break down and shift frequently and politicians from the same ethnic group are members of different political parties. The salience of ethnicity to politics in African countries varies widely and elections produce violence in some cases but not others. Moreover, our knowledge of the motivations of African voters remains murky, based primarily upon anecdotal reports, studies of a small number of (unscientifically selected) cases, or surveys that measure attitudes but not actual electoral behavior. Surprisingly, few scholars up to this point have employed the most powerful tool to measure vote choice: the exit poll. The investigators plan to explore the determinants of voting in Namibia, a transitioning democracy that features a dominant ethnic group: the Ovambo in Namibia represent nearly half the population. Scholars and policymakers consider Namibia to be on its way to stable democracy. However, a single party (SWAPO) has dominated politics since independence. To what extent is this dominance based on ethnic claims, and to what extent of performance or issue evaluations? Understanding the motivations of its voters opens the way to a deeper understanding of African politics, and help to inform scholarly opinion and the challenges (or not) that remain with respect to democracy promotion. (Do we want to learn more about how they vote so we can "sway" their votes for our benefit?) This project will have broader impacts by placing four graduate students and one undergraduate student in the field. The knowledge they will receive through helping to construct, manage, and analyze this exit poll is required to advance training beyond the classroom. For two of the students, it will be their first experience in Africa. (Vacation time!) For all, it will be the first time they are involved in generating quantitative scientifically produced primary data. This nation-wide exercise will also help in the participation and training of hundreds of enumerators in Namibia. Finally, the poll can also provide another check on the official electoral results which may prove unreliable given the challenges faced by the Namibian electoral commission to conduct a free and fair election.

Project Description: The primary objective of this project is, thus, to identify the micro-foundations of vote choice in sub-Saharan Africa through extensive analysis of individual-level exit poll data. Our project requires gathering sociodemographic, census, and political data to help us to design our poll well, writing and testing our exit poll in the field, training and supervising staff in the field, collecting and entering exit poll data into databases, analyzing and testing those data, and publishing the results of our analyses. We will disseminate our research results widely to academic and policy (.gov folks) audiences as well as develop a comprehensive dataset that will be accessible to the public. These efforts will result in a robust understanding of how Africans vote (Again, do we really need to spend $233,825 for this information?), which will in turn allow for a better targeting our external aid funds (Ah ha, more money we don't have to Africa. The real reason comes out.) aimed at promoting democracy on the continent.

Jobs Summary: Nothing to report, however future 7.98 FTE will include .17 FTE for both Principal Investigator's effort over the course of the project, .19 FTE for Graduate Student Researchers at UCSD, .44 FTE for Graduate Student Researchers at Georgetown, and 7.29 FTE for polling workers at Steadman (subaward) in Africa. (Total jobs reported: 0)

Project Status: Less Than 50% Completed

http://stimuluswatch.org/2.0/awards/view/2798/explaining-the-african-vote

Bank Closings-July 2nd, 9th and 16th, 2010

The following information is obtained from the following website: http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/press/2010/index.html

I need to do some catching up on the bank closures, so here goes....

1. Mainstreet Savings Bank, FSB, Hastings, Michigan, was closed today by the Office of Thrift Supervision, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. The two branches of Mainstreet Savings Bank, FSB will reopen on Saturday as branches of Commercial Bank. The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $11.4 million.

2. Olde Cypress Community Bank, Clewiston, Florida, was closed today by the Office of Thrift Supervision, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. The four branches of Olde Cypress Community Bank will reopen on Saturday as branches of CenterState Bank of Florida, N.A. The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $31.5 million.

3, 4, 5. Metro Bank of Dade County, Miami, Florida; Turnberry Bank, Aventura, Florida; and First National Bank of the South, Spartanburg, South Carolina, were closed today by federal and state banking agencies, which then appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver for all three institutions. Collectively, the three failed institutions operated 23 branches, which will reopen as branches of NAFH National Bank using their current names and under their normal business hours, including those offices with Saturday hours. The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) for Metro Bank of Dade County will be $67.6 million; for Turnberry Bank, $34.4 million; and for First National Bank of the South, $74.9 million.

6. Woodlands Bank, Bluffton, South Carolina, was closed today by the Office of Thrift Supervision, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. The eight branches of Woodlands Bank will reopen on Monday as branches of Bank of the Ozarks. The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $115.0 million.

7. Home National Bank, Blackwell, Oklahoma, was closed today by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. The 15 branches of Home National Bank will reopen on Saturday as branches of RCB Bank. Depositors of Home National Bank will automatically become depositors of RCB Bank. The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $78.7 million.

8. USA Bank, Port Chester, New York, was closed today by the New York State Banking Department, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. The sole branch of the failed bank will reopen on Saturday as a division of Customer's 1st Bank, thereby keeping the name USA Bank. The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $61.7 million.

9. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) approved the payout of the insured deposits of Ideal Federal Savings Bank. The bank was closed today by the Office of Thrift Supervision, which appointed the FDIC as receiver. The cost to the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund is estimated to be $2.1 million.

10. Bay National Bank, Baltimore, Maryland, was closed today by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. The two branches of Bay National Bank will reopen on Monday as branches of Bay Bank, FSB. Depositors of Bay National Bank will automatically become depositors of Bay Bank, FSB. The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $17.4 million.

Total Bank Closings (year-to-date) = 96


Cost to the FDIC (We The People) this week... $494.7 million


Cost to the FDIC (We The People) for 2010 thus far ... approx. $18.6 BILLION

Check out this website!!

I have to tell you that I have been invited to be a moderator for the medical forum on a survival and prepardness forum website. This is quite an honor for me...being able to work this close with other moderators with so much experience in their particular areas of expertise. I would encourage all of you to check this forum out and get involved. You will learn a lot about prepardness. They have great people there and they are more than happy to answer any questions you may have. You will have to register, but this is to help keep out spammers and the like.

http://www.survivalandpreparednessforum.com/

Check it out.

I'm Back!

Sorry that there have been no posts for a couple weeks. I was away on vacation and been busy since I have been back. Don't worry though, I'll get up to speed soon.

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Nancy Pelosi, (D) California, Time To Retire

Are you kidding me...Nancy Pelosi says that unemployment checks are the fastest way to create jobs. What has she been smoking? Her logic is that the unemployed will get a check and go out and spend it on "stuff" and that will create jobs. I think most of those that get these checks are spending it on rent, food, utilities, car and credit card payments. I would bet they don't have much left over for discretionary spending. Watch the video and hear Nancy Pelosi try and explain how this works.



Time to retire Nancy.

Pete Stark, Congressman (D) Needs To Retire

I am posting two videos, a short version and a longer version. Both will tell the story, but as all stories go, the longer one is better. It shows that illegal immigration is not a priority among many politicians. I think it is time for him to retire.

Longer version 9:46



Shorter version 3:10



So, no illegals crossing the border, our border is secure? Well, Rep. Stark, maybe you should go with the minutemen sometime and just observe for yourself.

"Batten Down The Hatches"

Do your friends a favor.  Tell them to "batten down the hatches" because there's a HARD RAIN coming. Tell them to get out of debt and sell anything they can sell (and don't need) in order to get liquid. Tell them that Richard Russell says that by the end of this year they won't recognize the country. They'll retort, "How the dickens does Russell know -- who told him?" Tell them the stock market told him.

This is what Richard Russell is saying. He is the author of  The Dow Theory Letters.
"And I ask myself, "Am I seeing things? The April 26 high for the Dow was 11205.03. The Dow is selling as write at 10557 down 648 points from its April high. (as I write this today, the Dow is 9667.54) If business is even better than expected, then why is the Dow down over 600 points? And why, if there were 674 new highs on the NYSE on April 26, were there only 20 new highs on Friday, May 14? And if my PTI was 6133 on April 26, why is it down 17 points since its April high?"

If you have not been following the news or the events of the world, wake up and get with it.